Consumption and Real Estate
Am I a scocialist liberal because I want the insurance companies to actually pay contracted medical bills.?
Question : Am I a scocialist liberal because I want the insurance companies to actually pay contracted medical bills.?
In the last question how Hillary intends to stop the insurance companies from cherry picking. I was accused of not working as hard as the top 1%, I was called a socialist liberal for wanting the checks and balances put back in place as Hillary has proposed to do with out raising taxes.
In the last 4 years the insurance companies have blatantly not paid bill after bill. I have gone to hearing after hearing until I gave up on that. I would win and they still didn’t pay.
In the 1st instance Blue Cross Blue Sheild did not pay for my daughters wheelchair resize and support she needed to take the stress off the spinal fusion. Her back broke from the stress in April. They did pay for the 2nd surgery and still not the support in her chair leaving her bed and home bound for a year. They were working in collaboration with the State of Wisconsin Medicaid because no insurance company will insure her completely since birth.
Am I a liberal socialist for wanting them to pay for agreed
Bwana It is my accusation that laws have been put in place by our reps allowing this to happen. I do believe Hillary is aware of what has happened and knows how to fix it. I don’t know about any strawman likeness. I worked for this care and the law has allowed them to just not deliver.
top home insurance companies
Best answer:
Answer by xuserx2000
no…your a consumer who expects to get what you paid for.
Privitization without regulation has not, and will never work in the healthcare industry.
-
-
#2 written by Steve M 1 year ago
No, if what you say is true, and according to your plan, the services provided are covered, and they have refused to pay, they are in breach.
This is no different than an ebay customer not getting his money from a winning bidder. A private matter over a private contract is not socialism. It is the apex of capitalism.
However, given Shrillary’s position, that government would mandate cetain contracts, and the government itself would hold and/or enforce those contracts, and those benefits are paid with tax dollars, that would be socialism.
It is a tried and true axion that you get what you pay for. When you are spending your own money, you will demand performance and value from it, and the people/services you hire would be obligated to perform, or risk losing your business. With any nationalized/socialized institution, the provider DOES NOT CARE about you, someone else is paying him, regardless whether or not you are satisfied. The interaction between customer/provider no longer exists. You cannot exert influence, you must take what is given and be happy, because you are not providing income to your provider. The government is doing that.
Go to your state Department of Motor Vehicles one day, or a Social Security office….are those the people we actually want running our health care?
-
#3 written by nostradamus02012 1 year ago
i work for one of the nations largest and most prestigious hospitals.
i can say with utter certainty that the system in place now can’t survive even this decade.
health insurance companies regard even basic treatments as ‘experimental’ and won’t cover them.
basically, health insurance companies don’t want to have anything to do with you if you ever get sick.
health insurance companies only want healthy people as customers – i think they are all in the wrong industry.
even just trying to call them on the phone can be quite an experience – and to any who have had to rely on these people for information, it is clear that they do everything they can (including some very transparant things) to avoid ever having claims filed and work very hard to deny those that do get filed.
-
#6 written by Dead Marxist 1 year ago
- Comment Feed for this Post
No, but then, nobody called you a socialist liberal for expecting another party to conform to their part of a contract.
Nice strawman attempt, but too transparent.
But if you think some other taxpayer should shell out the money for your medical needs, the money taken from their earnings using the coercive power of the state, then that is the essence of socialism / marxism. It is tax slavery imposed by others. It is wrong. And it is against every concept of freedom and liberty this country was founded upon.